Hot AI Models Comparison

ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini

Comparison of Quality, Performance&Content Window

Brands

Models

Quality

Speed

Context Window

Open AI

o1-preview

85 Score the Quality of o1-preview Index across evaluations of 85.

With a output speed of 36.4 tokens per second.

With a context window of 130k tokens.

Open AI

GPT-4o mini

71 Score With a MMLU score of 0.82 and a Quality Index across evaluations of 71.

With a output speed of 99.8 tokens per second.

With a context window of 130k tokens.

Open AI

GPT-4o

77 Score With a MMLU score of 0.887 and a Quality Index across evaluations of 77.

With a output speed of 86.6 tokens per second.

With a context window of 130k tokens.

Open AI

GPT-4 Turbo

74 Score With a MMLU score of 0.864 and a Quality Index across evaluations of 74.

GPT-4 Turbo is slower compared to average, with a output speed of 37.3 tokens per second.

GPT-4 Turbo has a smaller context windows than average, with a context window of 130k tokens.

Open AI

GPT-4

71 Score With a MMLU score of 0.82 and a Quality Index across evaluations of 71.

With a output speed of 23.8 tokens per second.

With a context window of 8.2k tokens.

Open AI

GPT-3.5 Turbo

52 Score GPT-3.5 Turbo is of lower quality compared to average, with a MMLU score of 0.7 and a Quality Index across evaluations of 52.

GPT-3.5 Turbo is faster compared to average, with a output speed of 102.8 tokens per second.

compared to average, with a output speed of 102.8 tokens per second. GPT-3.5 Turbo has a smaller context windows than average, with a context window of 16k tokens.

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

80 Score With Quality Index across evaluations of 80.

With a output speed of 55.6 tokens per second.

With a context window of 200k tokens.

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

69 Score With Quality Index across evaluations of 69.

With a output speed of 63.2 tokens per second.

With a context window of 200k tokens.

Anthropic

Claude 3 Opus

70 Score With a MMLU score of 0.868 and a Quality Index across evaluations of 70.

With a output speed of 27.2 tokens per second.

With a context window of 200k tokens.

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

54 Score With a MMLU score of 0.752 and a Quality Index across evaluations of 54.

With a output speed of 127.6 tokens per second.

With a context window of 200k tokens.

Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

80 Score With Quality Index across evaluations of 80.

With a output speed of 59.1 tokens per second.

With a context window of 2.0M tokens.

Google

Gemini 1.5 Flash

73 Score With Quality Index across evaluations of 73.

With a output speed of 190.4 tokens per second.

With a context window of 1.0M tokens.

Google

Gemini 1.0 Pro

60 Score With a price of $0.75 per 1M Tokens (blended 3:1).

With a output speed of 102.1 tokens per second.

With a context window of 33k tokens.

Data is alanalied by artificialanalysis.ai
quality-content

ChatArt's AI Model Compatibility

AI Chat is compatible with the highest quality AI models currently available

Both OpenAI and Anthropic have advanced models that each have their own strengths. ChatArt's AI Chat feature works really well with both of these models and does a better job of meeting users' needs.

compatibility-1

Comparison of Pricing

Projects

ChatArt

Open AI-Plus Plan

Anthropic-Pro Plan

Pricing

$16.99/month

$20/month

$20/month

AI models

Unlimited AI Chat with GPT-4o, OpenAI o1-preview, OpenAI o1-mini, GPT-4o mini, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro, etc.

Access to OpenAI o1-preview, OpenAI o1-mini. Access to GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o mini

Ability to use more models, like Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Access to data analysis, file uploads, vision, and web browsing

DALL·E image generation

Support image to image generation

AI Editor

100+ AI Writing Tools

Super Article Generator (General & SEO & Essay)

Bypass AI Detection & Humanize

Plagiarism Detection

SEO Checker & Optimization

Grammar Checker

Converse, Create, Enhance with ChatArt Today

social-1 social-2 social-3 social-4